Factual corrections
A concern should be traceable—not quietly overwritten.
Future correction handling is designed to keep the official source record immutable while a separate, auditable review decides what may be corrected, disputed, suppressed, or returned to the source authority.
このページは、医療機関情報を事実、根拠、更新時点に基づいて扱うための準備中の案内です。参加、掲載、確認、推薦を意味しません。
Pre-launch status: the formal correction, dispute, appeal, legal/takedown, and urgent-safety queues are not operating. The general email address is not a live correction service.
Separate intake types
A future report would be classified before review so different authority and urgency rules are not mixed.
- Official-source correction
- Authorized provider-supplied factual correction
- Public factual correction
- Legal or takedown request
- Safety or security report
Required audit trail
Each case would bind the provider and field, reported value, requested value, evidence references, source version, reporter category, timestamps, reviewer, decision and reason, publication effect, appeal, expiry, and rollback reference.
Disagreement and uncertainty
Conflicting evidence, provider-versus-official disagreement, stale official data, suspected impersonation, and unsupported language or accessibility claims would remain under review or be suppressed. Uncertainty would not be converted into a confident public fact.
No payment shortcut
Correction access and decision quality must not depend on a subscription, sponsorship, advertising spend, commercial relationship, or profile claim. Removal and safety concerns must not be delayed or conditioned on payment.